As Elizabeth Warren surges, policies seen as more important than gender

elizbeth warren

A majority of people interviewed this month in Washington, D.C. agree that gender will not influence their decision in the 2020 election, saying a person’s policies are what’s most important. 

However, many said they believe others would vote for a male candidate because of perceived stereotypes of women as too emotional, not fit for the job and overbearing. 

Richard Duncan, 61, who lives overseas with his wife but still votes in the presidential election by absentee ballot, said gender stereotypes are due to what he called cultural bias against women. He described it as “unfortunate” and “silly” for men to vote for only men in elections, but he sees hope for female candidates moving forward.

“It’s changed now with more and more women in executive (positions),” Duncan said, adding later, “It’s a start.”

Others interviewed said men may be nervous about female leadership in the United States.

Stef Woods, a professor at American University, 46, who teaches American Studies, said that stereotypes have come from “history but also societal context,” and “what identities people have seen as leaders,” influences voters.

Kathleen Dolan, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, wrote in her 2014 book “When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections”, that the public draws from negative assumptions made from a women’s attitude, characteristics and abilities.

However she wrote that while “these attitudes may have been present,” they “were not determinative,” adding that “they were not necessarily responsible for the fate of women candidates.”

Steward Beckham, 24, said the only way for things to change is for white people to hold other white people accountable because they won’t listen to minorities and women.

Beckham, 24, believes “white men need to speak out against other white men,” in order for gender stereotypes to end.

Often times when a person is voting they will have “implicit attitudes” about a candidate whether it is based on their personality, physical features, race or gender, said Brady Tuttle, an American University student.

Tuttle, 21, said the Trump administration has helped push “sexist” notions against women and those running for public office. She said that some Americans had that idea implicitly but the current administration has helped people to state their beliefs explicitly.

Cecilia Hyunjung Mo, assistant professor of political science at the University of California at Berkeley, wrote in Political Behavior, that people who already have a preference for male candidates do not care about information that makes a candidate stand out even if the female candidate is more qualified. However, people who implicitly prefer male candidates but say they vote equally between genders tend to select candidates who are more qualified.

Jerri Husch, 67, an adjunct professorial lecturer of sociology at American University, said she does “vote for the best candidate” and that “gender doesn’t matter” to her. She believes people should stop playing identity politics and that “you can’t assume” that men prefer to vote for other male candidates.

Others agreed with Husch and said that while gender is something they consider when voting it is not the deciding factor for them.

Jacqueline Martinez, 19, a STEP assistant at the Center for Diversity and Inclusion, said about the upcoming Democratic primary that while it would be great for someone like Kamala Harris to become the candidate as she would be the “first female black president”, “there are also a lot of things I don’t agree with her so I’ll probably vote for someone else.”

When asked about what should Americans do to eliminate biases attached to women candidates, Rose Strass, 19, thinks that we should “educate  people and have people focus more on platforms.”

Climate change ‘urgent’ issue for Gen Z voters in 2020

Climate pic

Generation Z–those born between 1997 and 2012–voters interviewed this month in Washington, D.C. said climate change is the single biggest issue that will decide their votes in the 2020 election.

Climate pic
Climate activists spoke at American University on June 20. (Photo by Natalia Cano)

The older members of Generation Z cast 4.5 million ballots in the 2018 midterm election, representing 4% of all votes, according to the Pew Research Center. By 2020, their impact could be even more powerful, when they are projected to comprise 10% of eligible voters.

“It’s time to wake up,” Ryan Cullen Barto, 20, said of younger generations facing the 2020 election.

These young voices see the upcoming election as an opportunity for change, and climate change is something they see as urgent.

Nadia Nazar, the 17-year-old co-founder of thisiszerohour.org, is very passionate about encouraging Gen Z to use their power to vote next year. She wants a great president, but also someone who will be a leader on climate change, and she believes young people need to understand what’s at stake.

“You’re voting for your life and for the sake of this country,” said Nazar, who lives in Baltimore. It “is important for our generation.”

Citizens Climate Lobby, a grassroots environmental organization, tweeted Thursday morning, the day after the first Democratic Presidential primary debate, that: “Last night’s disappointing treatment of at the underscores the need for a separate debate on the issue.”

climate tweet
A grassroots environmental organization wants a separate debate dedicated to climate change. (Photo courtesy of Twitter)

Meanwhile, younger citizens who still will be too young to cast a ballot next year say when they can vote, climate change is their main and overarching concern.

Not being able to vote next year, Annelise Bittenbender, 16, from Leesburg, Virginia, worries that her voice won’t be heard.

“I think it could potentially make or break the rest of what’s going to go on in the world,” Bittenbender said of climate change.

“This election could potentially make or break our earth so me not being able to vote stresses me out ’cause I just wanna try to help as much as I can but not actually having a say is difficult,” Bittenbender continued.

The scientific community agrees overwhelmingly “climate change is real,” according to one statement on the NASA website.

Among those statements, the American Geophysical Union wrote: “Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes.”

Generation Z’s youngest members may not be able to vote next year, but they already are organizing and fighting to be heard about climate change.

Ethan Vandivier, 13, already is an advisory board member for Young Voice for the Planet. He spoke on a panel at American University on June 20, noting that the next election is going to determine not just leadership, but will frame debates and policy solutions for climate change.

“For new people who are trying to get involved, voting is very important,” Vandivier said. “That’s how you start. That’s where you start.”

With protests on the rise this year, district residents split on political effect

girl at bus stop

Washington, D.C. residents offered divided views on protests that are on the rise this year and what effect they are having on the country.

Interviews conducted this week in the district showed many people were split on the issue of protests, that range from major demonstrations like the March for Our Lives to smaller marches by restaurant workers.

Luke Baker, 19, has definitely noticed the spike in protests around the district, saying he thinks the men and women want “an overhaul.”

“That’s beautiful,” said Baker, who lives in Texas and was working at American University this summer.

“If we didn’t protest,” Baker said, society would “be a hellscape or a utopia.”

Not everyone agrees.

Keiran Bly, 28, believes that protesting is a poor way of solving problems. Bly said to make change people should run for political office.

Bly said he wished for protest fatigue, but didn’t believe that the people protesting would tire out any time soon.

The most recent figures from a nonpartisan crowd counting group show Bly may be right.

The amount of protests in 2018 has already surpassed the total number of protests in 2017, according to Crowd Counting Consortium, a public interest group founded by two political science professors.

The CCC estimated that in 2017 there was over 8,700 protests nationwide. Through May 2018–the most recent numbers available–the number of protests already had reached 9,710.

Not everyone plans on attending protests.

Rishi Mittal, 17, fears attending marches or rallies nearly a year after a self-described neo-Nazi allegedly plowed his car into a group of counter-protesters killing Heather Heyer. Mittal said he worries about “another Charlottesville” and said he prefers to watch at home on television.

Josh Ledyart, 21, hasn’t been to a protest in the last year due to a lack of free time, but he said he is supportive.

girl at bus stop
Samantha Danzinger, 20, thinks protests may be adding to the feeling of partisan divide. Photo by Kendall Gilvar.

“The protests put a lot of pressure on unpopular policies,” said Ledyart, who believes the spike in protests was caused by the Trump administration’s policies that showed what he calls a “lack of respect for humanity.”

Pamela Oliver, a sociology professor at the University of Wisconsin, attributed the rise to a “protest wave” that she said is common when one political party is out of power.

“I do think the people opposed to President Trump and the Republican policies feel both especially outraged and highly motivated to protest,” said Oliver, who is an expert in collective action and social movements.

Oliver also said in an email interview that the current round of protests had “a strong partisan element.” Oliver also cited large amounts of protests by Democrats during the George W. Bush administration and that less Democrats protested during Barack Obama’s tenure in office.

“Another thing that happens is that people who are not protesters get tired of the disruption after a while and start becoming more supportive of repressive measures to force protests down,” Oliver said by email.

 

 

Political divide widens as teenagers ready for first vote in November

elephant

elephant
An elephant representing the Republican party stands outside the School of Public Affairs at American University. Photo by Nina Khoshkish.

donkey
A donkey representing the Democratic party stands outside the School of Public Affairs at American University. Photo by Nina Khoshkish.

Metropolitan Washington, D.C. residents said that partisan politics is worse than they can remember, claiming the people are polarized and many are still dealing with the aftermath of the controversial and bitter 2016 Presidential election.

Michael Dahan, 50, who lives in Gaithersburg, Maryland, is a registered Democrat because of that party’s position regarding protecting the weakest in society, he said in a recent interview.

Dahan disagrees with the current government’s positions on most issues, because he fears that democracy is being “eroded away.”

“I believe the path to an authoritarian government is very short,” Dahan said.

The positive, as Dahan sees it, is his party being “re-energized.”

Another interviewee, Redmond Walsh, 58, also believes that Democrats are “amped up” and said he thinks even Republicans are showing signs of Trump fatigue.

“They got their win in 2016, and now they’re ashamed of what they have,” Walsh said. “They’re ashamed of Trump, so they’re keeping quiet.”

Nonetheless, still the divide between Republicans and Democrats appears to be widening, according to interviews done this week and a Pew Research Center report.

According to a study at Pew Research Center, divides in politics are bigger now than at any point in the last two decades.

Erin Fardshisheh, 34, believes that the divide America is dealing with today is thanks to “the silent majority.”

I think people still talk politics, but mostly within their own echo chambers,” Fardshisheh said. “And that breeds cultural humiliation. It hardens people and their political views, and it’s precisely how we ended up here.”

This divide is also affecting younger generations and many interviewed this week said they wonder if they’ll be able to bridge the gap.

Joseph Grandison, 20, said he has not been keeping up with politics or watching the news lately.

“I want to enjoy myself,” Grandison said. “Watching today’s news does the opposite for me.”

Many under the age of 25 will stop at nothing to get involved and take matters into their own hands, especially when they have faced real-life violence and social upheaval.

For Ryan Foster, 2018 marks his first eligible election. And the Rhode Island resident said he isn’t going to miss a chance to cast his vote during what many said regardless of party was such a crucial time for the country.

“I’m excited to be able to contribute my part in our country’s political scene,” said Foster, 17. “I hope that a lot of other kids my age feel the same way. I know many who won’t be voting to avoid the controversy, but their votes are what we need to bring back balance.”

Some of these divides are also present within parties as well.

Foster believes that the Democratic party “has some unrest and divide in it, especially with individuals who are registered Democratic but are more Libertarian or centrist.”

“The GOP has lost itself and is now a host body being inhabited by a parasitic organism, something that is not authentic Conservatism. What’s going to happen next is the far left will respond to the parasite by destroying its own left-centrists,” Fardshisheh said. “It’s incredibly important that we do not let that happen.”

With midterms coming up, Fardshisheh believes that the “RESIST” mindset needs to be forgotten, and that those who really want to resist need to “get out, grab four friends and start knocking on doors for the 2018 midterms.”

 

The Poor People’s Campaign Takes on Capitol Hill.

Chalkboard side of a wooden structure outside the Poor People’s Campaign tent with the Capitol Building in the background. Photo by Sam DeFusco, Teen Observer.

Washington, D.C. — On Thursday, June 21, people gathered outside of a large white tent near Capitol Hill to revive the mission that Martin Luther King Jr. began 50 years ago.

These people were rallying as members of the Poor People’s Campaign.

According to John Wessel-McCoy, a volunteer for the campaign who was at Capitol Hill, the focus of the Poor People’s Campaign is to give a voice to those who do not have one. “We are trying to build the organization in states all over the country,” McCoy said as music blared from speakers, grabbing the attention of people walking by.

“Tens of millions don’t have access to healthcare. People are dying because they don’t have access to healthcare,” McCoy explained. He also went on to discuss how the Poor People’s campaign is trying to create a moral revival.

At Capitol Hill on Thursday, the Poor People’s Campaign was working to bring attention to problems occurring in D.C. Such problems include racism and its effects on poverty, ecology and health, militarism and the war economy, the homeless population and more.

They base their agenda on fundamental rights, and they say the campaign is “a national call for moral revival,” according to the Poor People’s Campaign. “There is a distorted moral narrative out there,” said McCoy.

At Capitol Hill, the Poor People’s Campaign handed out papers with information about their campaign and what they are trying to accomplish. They also give the history of the campaign and how it all began with Martin Luther King Jr.

Poor People’s Campaign poster. Photo by Sam DeFusco, Teen Observer.

“Fifty years ago, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and many other leaders launched a Poor People’s Campaign to tackle the pervasive problems of systemic racism, poverty, and militarism,” according to the Poor People’s Campaign. “By many measures, these interrelated problems are worse today than they were in 1968. And if you add in climate change and ecological devastation, the urgency is even greater.”

The Poor People’s Campaign is based on people’s religious and constitutional values that call for justice. They are committed to aiding people affected by systemic racism, poverty, discrimination, the war economy, and more in a peaceful way. The Campaign promotes peaceful protests, and violence is not tolerated by them.

Americans weigh in on Trump…so far

If Gary Bochner could go back in time, he’d do November differently.

Bochner, 58, who voted for Donald Trump says that he would vote for another candidate. Bochner says that seeing that President Trump has not done any of the things he promised and has even made enemies with many world leaders, he is rethinking his vote.

“At the time, I was unemployed and the idea that he was going to ‘Make America Great Again’ and give jobs back to Americans really appealed to me,” Bochner said.

Sarah Yu said she is feeling frustrated and angry about the Trump Administration. By Vicky Tan

As President Trump nears the six month mark of his time in office, his approval ratings continue to drop, even those like Bochner who voted for him in the 2016 election are unhappy with how he has used his power so far.

According to the Gallup Daily, only 39 percent of Americans support the Trump Administration.

Among other District of Columbia residents, many believe that the Trump Administration is actually hurting the country.

Interviews done this week at American University and in Dupont Circle showed that many people had a range of issues they said were important. Those included: the environment, tax reform, relations with other nations, immigration policy reform and improving healthcare.

Eric Pullman, 17, said that Trump has disappointed the country in how he’s handled all of those substantial issues. And, Pullman said, he thinks racism also has gotten worse.

“His drastic actions hurt us all as Americans,” Pullman said. “This is not what we stand for. If Trump is to win a second term in office, I am not sure the county will be able to bounce back from it. The United States has become a laughing stock.”

As a Jewish-American living in the Bible Belt of the United States, Pullman has grown accustomed to weird looks.

“I am proud of my religion,” said Pullman, who is from Alabama, and was visiting Washington, D.C. to visit colleges. “Their stares cannot hurt me. I will not be ashamed of who I am.”

However, for Pullman’s Muslim neighbors, it is not just stares. He says that since Trump has taken office, discrimination has gotten worse.

“Their eldest daughter and I will sometimes walk to school together. One morning, somebody rode by on a bike and pulled off her hijab while yelling about how Trump would make America great again. As a Jewish-American, I feel the need to stand against actions like this,” Pullman said.

 

 

U.S. student debt tops $1.4 trillion

WASHINGTON, D.C.–American University students and Northwest District of Columbia residents said Wednesday that student loan debt which is above $1.4 trillion in the United States today is a serious issue facing those seeking higher education in America.

Nelson Jacobson discusses his experience with student loans. By Vicky Tan

“Interest rates are rising and I’m scared that I’ll still be paying of loans when I’m 35,” said Leila Ackerman, 18, who will start at American University this Fall.

Ackerman worries about expenses beyond just tuition and housing. She said the hidden costs are also going to add up. Not only is tuition becoming more and more expensive, but new students must be able to afford food, textbooks and other necessities to living away from home.

“I’m one of the lucky ones, I can’t even imagine what having loans breathing down your back would feel like,” said Janice Barlow, 20, an American University student. “You really can’t do anything. Every thing you do, anywhere you go, you have to be thinking about money.”

According to the Student Loan Debt Report, national student loan debt collectively currently totals $1.41 trillion.

According to the report, around 70 percent of college students in the United States now owe some soft of debt for education. However, even with almost a whole generation drowning in student loan debt, there is no guarantee of employment after they graduate.

There was a general consensus among both residents and students that government is not doing enough to help financially struggling students. With interest rates slowly rising, the nation has not made education as high a priority as others, they said.

“Government should try to make education more affordable, everyone should have the opportunity to go to get a better education if they want to. Money should not be a limiting factor,” Ackerman said.

 

Political divide defines July Fourth celebrations

WASHINGTON, D.C.–Widespread political division has many Washington, D.C. area residents and college students questioning the meaning of Independence Day this year and how protests should be handled.

American University students and employees interviewed Wednesday disagreed about the holiday’s meaning, saying it carries its own traditions no matter the year.

“Nostalgia,” said Stephanie Blenko, 19, speaking about Independence Day this year. “I’m away from home for the first time and the fireworks remind me of home.”

An American flag hangs at a retail shop in Tenleytown. By Gabriel Ferris.

With a nation that is politically divided, millennials said July Fourth means time with friends rather than time celebrating patriotism or the holiday’s deep symbolic meaning. Younger residents showed more resistance to the traditional patriotic interpretation, but some still said it’s a time to heal political divides.

“In the 1700’s, we came together and I think we can also come together now,” said Laurel Gupton, 19, of Essex Fells, New Jersey. “We are all still American.”

Still, Gupton and many others interviewed this week said planned protests or political dissent on the holiday were a reminder of America’s freedoms.

Mindy Ford, 45, said she is unhappy with the current administration, but vowed to celebrate July 4 and how the far the nation has come.

Still, some said protesting on the Fourth of July remains in stark contrast to what the Founding Fathers stood for.

“Protesting on the Fourth seems to be anti-patriotism; that’s my observation,” said Barry Jones, a 57-year-old independent voter.

Celebrating a holiday that commemorates America is a hard pill to swallow for some, especially those who still feel institutional racism is a problem.

A 2016 report published by the Pew Research Center said that 88 percent of blacks believe America still has steps to take to ensure equality for their race.

Carl Amritt, 22, of West Palm Beach, Florida, spoke about how political discord is affecting July Fourth this year. By Gabriel Ferris.

That will manifest itself in how people like 23-year-old Dekyan Dennis, who is black, will celebrate the Fourth of July.

“I will not be celebrating,” said Dennis, who said her boyfriend serves in the U.S. Army. “The flag represents equality and justice but our nation doesn’t embody these ideals.”

Although fireworks and large American flags are at the forefront of most July Fourth celebrations, what they symbolize is anything but concrete.

“July Fourth is about beliefs,” Blenko said.

 

White nationalists’ behavior impacts D.C. residents

Supporter of the alt-right at a protest condemning same-sex marriage https://www.pexels.com/photo/alt-right-367032/

Members of the diverse community in northwest D.C. experience the effects of the president Trump’s rhetoric. They noticed an increase in tension regarding current politics after the 2016 election cycle.

Over the last two years, Donald Trump and alt-right movement have brought white nationalism to the mainstream American audience, research shows.

New Nationalism is the name being used for white nationalist groups, mostly from the far right. In recent years, the messages these groups spread have had a large influence in American politics, but the impact on the people is often not discussed.

“There’s a lot of hate now,” Eddie Malihi, 48, said about the emotions after the 2016 election.

Many share Malihi’s observations about the increase in hate. Hate incidents have been increasingly common in the time after Nov. 6, 2016.

The Southern Poverty Law Center documented 867 bias-related incidents in the first ten days after Trump’s election. This included anti-Immigrant, anti-Muslim, homophobic and racist actions by supporters of Trump’s messages during the campaign cycle.

“We’re becoming more accepting of the racism and hate in our country,” Hannah Christie, 17, said about the direction the U.S. seems to be heading.

Trump’s anti-Muslim rhetoric was a prominent factor in the 2016 campaign cycle and a deciding factor for many voters. According to the Southern Poverty Law Center’s annual report, the anger over Muslim citizens resulted in a 190 percent increase in the number of anti-Muslim hate groups since 2015. This is a result of the Donald Trump campaign and election.

In response to the rise of hateful actions and speech, citizens have taken to the streets to show their discontent. There has been an influx of protests, marches and demonstrations to illustrate these feelings. On January 21, five million people across all seven continents, came together to march for human rights and representation. Earth Day, April 22, also saw the March for Science. Over one million people marched in order to display the importance of science in everyday life.

Even though there has been a increase in white nationalism and hate groups, many are hopeful of the future after the Trump administration.

“Once we have the right person in office we can start to rebuild and grow,” Malihi said.

Independents stake claim in polarized system

Naval Officer and independent voter, Barry Jones, reflects on his political ideology.

Voters in the Washington D.C. area last week explained what it means to be an independent voter and how that affects their participation in a two-party system. The increase in independent voters in the U.S. has welcomed diversity in political beliefs and affiliation.

David Rusk, former Mayor of Albuquerque, N.M. said he’s seen a change within the two-party system, a pull to the left and a swing to the ultra right.

The current political system proves many aren’t happy with the two parties and what they have to offer.

“I just feel that over the past eight to ten years neither democratic or republican parties really address certain issues that are of concern,” said Kentha Stephens, 40, of Houston, Texas. 

A Pew Research Center study shows that there has been an 11 percent increase in independent voters from the year 2000 to 2015.

A Gallup study shows that in the year of 2015 43 percent of U.S. voters identify as being Independent.

Some independent voters admit that their set of political beliefs come from each of the two majors parties.

“Basically I kinda choose the way you would at a cafeteria. Maybe a conservative viewpoint that might agree with me and a liberal viewpoint that might agree with me,” former Naval Officer Barry Jones said. 

Jones, did not always consider himself an independent. He used to vote for republican candidates and then later for democratic ones.

This shift in party identification is common among independents. Stephen said his ideologies were a result of his parents beliefs but later changed to his own.

The increase in independent voters and the trend of changing beliefs, has been a result of the availability of information. The internet created a space for a wide spectrum of ideas eliminating the ability of the parties to control the political narrative. 

“Until the internet came along and changed everything it was harder to find all that diversity of opinion and an opposition to an opinion.”Jones said.