As Elizabeth Warren surges, policies seen as more important than gender

elizbeth warren

A majority of people interviewed this month in Washington, D.C. agree that gender will not influence their decision in the 2020 election, saying a person’s policies are what’s most important. 

However, many said they believe others would vote for a male candidate because of perceived stereotypes of women as too emotional, not fit for the job and overbearing. 

Richard Duncan, 61, who lives overseas with his wife but still votes in the presidential election by absentee ballot, said gender stereotypes are due to what he called cultural bias against women. He described it as “unfortunate” and “silly” for men to vote for only men in elections, but he sees hope for female candidates moving forward.

“It’s changed now with more and more women in executive (positions),” Duncan said, adding later, “It’s a start.”

Others interviewed said men may be nervous about female leadership in the United States.

Stef Woods, a professor at American University, 46, who teaches American Studies, said that stereotypes have come from “history but also societal context,” and “what identities people have seen as leaders,” influences voters.

Kathleen Dolan, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, wrote in her 2014 book “When Does Gender Matter? Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections”, that the public draws from negative assumptions made from a women’s attitude, characteristics and abilities.

However she wrote that while “these attitudes may have been present,” they “were not determinative,” adding that “they were not necessarily responsible for the fate of women candidates.”

Steward Beckham, 24, said the only way for things to change is for white people to hold other white people accountable because they won’t listen to minorities and women.

Beckham, 24, believes “white men need to speak out against other white men,” in order for gender stereotypes to end.

Often times when a person is voting they will have “implicit attitudes” about a candidate whether it is based on their personality, physical features, race or gender, said Brady Tuttle, an American University student.

Tuttle, 21, said the Trump administration has helped push “sexist” notions against women and those running for public office. She said that some Americans had that idea implicitly but the current administration has helped people to state their beliefs explicitly.

Cecilia Hyunjung Mo, assistant professor of political science at the University of California at Berkeley, wrote in Political Behavior, that people who already have a preference for male candidates do not care about information that makes a candidate stand out even if the female candidate is more qualified. However, people who implicitly prefer male candidates but say they vote equally between genders tend to select candidates who are more qualified.

Jerri Husch, 67, an adjunct professorial lecturer of sociology at American University, said she does “vote for the best candidate” and that “gender doesn’t matter” to her. She believes people should stop playing identity politics and that “you can’t assume” that men prefer to vote for other male candidates.

Others agreed with Husch and said that while gender is something they consider when voting it is not the deciding factor for them.

Jacqueline Martinez, 19, a STEP assistant at the Center for Diversity and Inclusion, said about the upcoming Democratic primary that while it would be great for someone like Kamala Harris to become the candidate as she would be the “first female black president”, “there are also a lot of things I don’t agree with her so I’ll probably vote for someone else.”

When asked about what should Americans do to eliminate biases attached to women candidates, Rose Strass, 19, thinks that we should “educate  people and have people focus more on platforms.”

Gender neutral bathrooms part of creating inclusive spaces

gender neutral

Students and staff interviewed this week in Washington, D.C., shared their thoughts on gender neutral bathrooms, which have become common at American University.

Tiffany Speaks, senior director for the Center for Diversity and Inclusion, said bathrooms are mainly being installed for everyone to feel welcomed.

Speaks quoted from American University’s website saying: “The university is committed to having safe and accessible campus restroom facilities.”

Violence against the transgender community mostly happens in public restrooms, according to a 2013 Williams Institute report. Derrick Clifton wrote that “roughly 70% of trans people have reported being denied entrance, assaulted or harassed while trying to use a restroom,” according to a 2013 Williams Institute report.

gender neutral
A gender neutral bathroom at American University. (Photo by Joel Lev-Tov)

Mumina Ali, an incoming first year student at American University, believes the school is doing a great job by installing gender neutral bathrooms.

“This campus is about being inclusive and embracing diversity,” Ali said. “Not everyone has the same identity. So I think that’s the main reason is to create a safe space where people feel as if they’re wanted, rather than anywhere in the rest of the world, they can feel like that.”

Donna Femenella, 40, Course Reserves coordinator at American University’s Bender Library, believes that the gender neutral bathrooms create a safe space for members of the LGBTQ community.

“It’s not creating a barrier where a decision has to be made in terms of kind of what a person identifies as,” Femenella said. “So I think just being able to know that a bodily function you can just do without any barriers.”

 

Immigration, equality top political issues at Pier 39

SAN FRANCISCO — The Teen Observer asked people at Pier 39 in San Francisco on Monday to write down the most important issue to them in the 2016 Presidential Election. Answers ranged from education to immigration and the war on drugs.

environment
Bay area resident Chris Whitlock prioritizes the environment. He said, “some people are saying that it’s too late, but if our lives are in jeopardy, it’s the most important thing.” Photo by Victoria Shirley

 

 

 

 

 

equal rights
Dani Whitlock spoke to how equality is important for all, mentioning the LGBT community, women and minorities. She said, “We should be leveling the playing field, not sweeping this under the rug.” Photo by Victoria Shirley

 

Alper Sengul, a Turkish airline pilot, is not an American citizen but he keeps track of the election by "following the stupid things 'The Donald' is doing." He is passionate about foreign relations and education. Photo by Victoria Shirley
Alper Sengul, a Turkish airline pilot, is not an American citizen but he keeps track of the election by “following the stupid things ‘The Donald’ is doing.” He is passionate about foreign relations and education. Photo by Victoria Shirley

 

Pheobe Marsh, 18, feels strongly about the war on drugs and is a proponent of legalizing recreational drugs. She said, "I believe it should be legal...What they're doing is ridiculous." Photo by Victoria Shirley
Pheobe Marsh, 18, feels strongly about the war on drugs and is a proponent of legalizing recreational drugs. She said, “I believe it should be legal…What they’re doing is ridiculous.” Photo by Victoria Shirley

 

Danica Sheets says that immigration rights is the most important issue to her. She said, "Immigration into society is important. It shouldn't be a 'you're in the shadows' kind of thing." Photo by Victoria Shirley
Danica Sheets says that immigration rights are the most important issue to her. She said, “Integration into society is important. It shouldn’t be a ‘you’re in the shadows’ kind of thing.” Photo by Victoria Shirley

 

 

Wage gap concern for District men and women

Wage gap

Frank Rivera, a Washington, D.C. resident and American University alumnus, feels that wage gaps between men and women in the United States are unfair.

“It disturbs me, of course,” Rivera said. “When we talk about justice and this happens. I feel helpless, frustrated, and anger.”

White women earn 77 cents for every dollar earned by a white man. But the National Organization for Women says that number may actually be worse for women in the United States. For minorities, the gap is even wider.

Richard Hawkins, 40, who lives in D.C., said there should be a law put in place to prevent the wage gap between men and women.

The Equal Pay Act of 1963  “prohibits sex-based wage discrimination between men and women in the same establishment who perform jobs that require substantially equal skill, effort, and responsibility.

Wage gap
Women earn 77 cents for every dollar a man earns in the United States. Photo credit Olivia Azulay.

But many interviewed this week said that isn’t doing enough.

“Just because you’re a woman doesn’t mean you should be deprived of employment rights,” Rivera said. “Maybe employers should be monitored, they should be held accountable.”

Katherine Schwartz, a 20-year-old who recently returned from studying abroad in Sydney, Australia said the wage gap is unfair.

Schwartz feels especially angry about the potential to earn less than a man for the same work. She wants to be a mechanical engineer, a career she sees as male-dominated.

“It’s frustrating,” Schwartz said, adding the gap is a “systematic issue since women started joining the workforce.”

 

 

AU community will see more gender inclusive signs on restrooms

Gender Inclusive sign

American University will increase the number of gender inclusive restrooms on campus and will up the number of signs indicating where they are located, according to a university official.

Gender Inclusive sign
A man walks by a sign noting a new gender inclusive restroom inside the School of International Service at American University. Photo credit Jennie Yu.

The university had previously referred to the facilities as family or unisex restrooms,in the wake of a 2006 Washington, D.C. law.

Sara Bendoraitis, 37, the Director of Programming, Outreach, and Advocacy at American University’s Center for Diversity and Inclusion said that 2006 law was the main factor prompting the change in how restrooms were labelled on campus.

“People have the right to use the bathroom that best fits their identity,” Bendoraitis said.

Under that act’s Gender Identity and Expression clause, all public facilities are lawfully required to provide adequate accommodations for individuals who would feel uncomfortable or unsafe using restrooms that are gender segregated. In addition, single-stall restrooms must have gender neutral signs.

Of gender neutral bathrooms on campus, Bendoraitis said they “are not new on campus, and they actually exist in all aspects of our daily lives.”

Although laws protecting gender neutral spaces have been on the books in the district for a decade, the issue gained widespread prominence after North Carolina legislators voted in March to strip transgender individuals of their right to use a public facility of the gender they identify as.

Laura Neumayer, a 19-year-old junior studying in the School of International Service, and Julia Baldwin, 24, studying nutrition, both agreed that American’s decision to classify several restrooms as gender neutral was not surprising.

“AU is notably liberal and progressive, and the student body is very inclusive,” said Neumayer, who worked on a laptop outside the Dav cafe. “They have always tried to be this way, so the gender neutral restrooms have been on campus for a while.”

Some voiced opposition, saying they did not see the necessity of changing the signage on campus.

Carl LeVan, 45, is an associate professor of political science. He believes the university made a courageous decision by updating its signage, but he was unclear as to why labeling restrooms as unisex was inadequate.

Bendoraitis said that although the function of the facilities themselves has not changed, new labels of gender neutral are essential in order for AU to meet the needs of those who may not be comfortable using the traditional single sex restrooms.

Dorm bathroom sign
A sign posted outside a gender-neutral bathroom at an American University dorm encourages inclusion. Photo credit Jennie Yu.

“It is not about the comfort of everybody else,” Bendoraitis said. “It’s about the comfort of that person, and making sure they have access to the facilities that they would like to use.”

Tenleytown residents hail downfall of Mississippi LGBT law

Courtesy of http://cleoinc.org/
Image of U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves (photo from cleoinc.org)

Tenleytown citizens on Friday showed their support for U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves’ blocking of a Mississippi law that would have made religious beliefs an acceptable reason to deny LGBT persons in that state basic services.

Reeves ruled on June 30–the day before it was to take effect–that the law, House Bill 1523, violates lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender citizens’ rights.

“It’s not right to deny people services because they are gay or transgender,” said Tracy Watson, 47. “It’s a basic human condition. It’s fundamental to who we are. There’s no reason except for age-old prejudices for such discrimination.”

The bill would have allowed landlords to evict LGBT people, companies to fire them, businesses to refuse services, doctors to refuse help and clerks to deny marriage licenses.

“Being denied services makes them feel like their sexuality or gender identity alienates them from the rest of human life,” said Emma Wallenbrock, a 15-year-old eating lunch in Tenleytown. “This goes against the ideals that our nation was founded.

Sofia Baneth, a 21-year-old American University student, agreed.

“Services are a 100% unalienable right. It isn’t harming anyone else,” Baneth said.

Reeves said in his 60-page opinion that the Mississippi law violates the 14th Amendment, although lawmakers who favored the bill claimed it promoted religious liberty and protected patrons who are anti-LGBT due to their religious beliefs.

Bretton Caws, 21, who attends American University, said separation of Church and State is a fundamental American issue.

“You can’t pick and choose who gets rights and who doesn’t,” Caws said.

 

 

 

 

Younger generation more supportive of gender-neutral bathrooms

Gender-neutral restrooms are getting a lot of attention since a 2016 North Carolina law was passed. Photo by Jocie Nelson.
Gender-neutral restrooms are getting a lot of attention since a 2016 North Carolina law was passed. Photo by Jocie Nelson.

District residents and visitors took a short time away from walking their dogs and watching the Smithsonian Folklife Festival to voice their opinions in the debate against North Carolina’s law restricting transgender people from using the bathroom where they are most comfortable.

Julien Doe, 42, a father of one, supported gender-neutral bathroom access, however, said he wouldn’t want his daughter using those same facilities.

“Some things a 10-year-old little girl shouldn’t see,” Doe said.

Ed Leclair, 62, does not have children, but he works with them and is confident in everyone’s ability to keep themselves private in a bathroom.

In March, North Carolina passed the law stating individuals could only use the bathroom that corresponded with their biological sex at birth.

David Owens, 45, disagreed with Doe. Owens, a father of four, expressed support for gender-neutral bathrooms and said his was “not afraid” of his children using the same ones.

Teenagers were more open-minded than their parents.

Pace Bongiovanni, 15, knew little about the North Carolina law, but said the government shouldn’t regulate bathrooms.

“I don’t think they should prevent it,” Bongiovanni said.

Juliet Smith, 18, was angry about the North Carolina law.

“People are ignorant and don’t treat people as they should,” Smith said.

 

 

Transgender movement gathers awareness and supporters

Washington D.C. residents and students expressed varying viewpoints about the transgender movement, which has gathered momentum in the last couple of years in the wake of several high-profile celebrity advocates and television shows.

This week in Tenleytown, a half dozen interviewees leaned toward a more accepting and liberal standpoint of transgender icons, people and the movement in general.

Michelle Nowak, 19, is involved in the Human Rights Campaign, which fights for LGBTQ equality in the workplace. She identifies as “liberal” from a social standpoint but conservative from an economic perspective.

Nowak supports the transgender movement wholeheartedly. She was especially concerned with allowing not just transgender people–but any person–to enjoy the life they live and to be comfortable.

“If that’s how they find happiness, then I’m not going to get in the way of that,” Nowak said.

Alison Jones, 20, an American University student, includes transgender friends in her group and openly supports LGBTQ rights and the community.

Jones said the experience of her transgender friends is predominantly negative and says they sometimes face discrimination from others even in places often identified as liberal.

“It’s a process of talking to them about their experience,” Jones said. She added, “It’s definitely eye-opening.”

Photo by Lenny Ignelzi, Associated Press.
Photo by Lenny Ignelzi, Associated Press.

Transgender icons impact their community as well as the general LGBTQ community. Laverne Cox, a transgender woman famous for her role in the Netflix series Orange is the New Black, advocates for stronger acceptance.

The award-winning Amazon series Transparent won big at the Golden Globes this year. It features a transgender woman as its protagonist.

Caitlyn Jenner, too, brought the issue to the public’s attention with her cover story in Vanity Fair, and an interview with Diane Sawyer earlier this year.

Bryan Bauer, 19, said he didn’t have a strong opinion regarding the transgender community and didn’t think he was personally affected by it.

On the topic of Jenner, Bauer said that Jenner “was a good athlete at some point, but made his own decision, and it’s his decision, not mine.”

The issue of transgender people in the media has received attention from major advocacy groups like GLAAD, which has a media reference guide on transgender issues. Even though Bauer referred to Jenner with the male pronoun, GLAAD’s guidelines favor that the media use the transgender person’s preferred pronoun.

Emma Jackson, 31, mentioned that while she could not speak on behalf of the transgender community, she did approve of the fact that transgender icons such as Cox raised awareness, however she added that there were both upsides and downfalls.

“By opening themselves up to conversation, they allow that conversation to take place,” said Jackson, regarding transgender icons representing their community through the media.

Lee Martin, a college junior at Christopher Newport University and a liberal, believes that Cox is “awesome” and a strong figure of the LGBTQ and transgender community.

“She’s doing a great job at portraying the transgender community and that they aren’t something weird or unnatural,” said Martin, who is a teaching assistant this summer for a high school program at American University.

This week at Washington D.C.’s National Mall, interviewees were primarily indifferent toward topics relating to the transgender community but said advocacy is making its way through social media.

Emily Brown, 19, mentioned that social media in particular informed her view of the transgender community, and she stayed informed through the news, Facebook and Tumblr.

“Through the media coverage I’ve learned more of like, how to address transgender people,” said Brown, on the topic of transgender celebrities in the media.

 

SCOTUS same-sex ruling brings diverse opinions

Students and residents in the Washington D.C. area offered diverse opinions regarding June’s historic U.S. Supreme Court same-sex marriage ruling, with many people’s views mirroring how they feel about homosexuality as more than just the right to marry.

On June 26, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled same sex marriage is a Constitutional right, prompting passionate response from dissenters but candid support from those who contend homosexuality is natural and the denial of rights misguided.

People celebrate the June 26 same-sex marriage decision by the U.S. Supreme Court decision.  Associated Press photo by Jaquelyn Martin.
People celebrate the June 26 same-sex marriage decision by the U.S. Supreme Court decision. Associated Press photo by Jaquelyn Martin.

“It isn’t right to denigrate people for something that isn’t their fault,” said Cafoncelli Antonio, a 76-year-old professor at American University, who explained that revolutionary genetic studies have proven the genomes of a person determine their sexuality.

While Antonio cited scientific arguments about homosexuality’s origins, others interviewed cited personal relationships and religion as reasons to favor or oppose same-sex marriage.

Pro-gay sentiment however, was rather high amongst the majority of people interviewed in Northwest Washington D.C. as many believed that they were not affected by homosexuals getting more rights, so they said it made no sense to fight against same-sex marriage.

“Who am I to judge?” said Sarah Belson, dean of the American University’s School of Education.

However, on the opposite end of the spectrum, those who didn’t favor the ruling, were firm in their dissent.

“Family business is a woman’s business,” said Alex Medouni, a 50-year-old resident of Washington D.C. discussing his opposition the same-sex marriage ruling. “The victims are children.”

Four people interviewed this month who were against the ruling agreed children would not have a solid family foundation or moral compass under laws granting same-sex marriage.

But, Ned McFadden, 45, found the argument that children would be harmed unpersuasive. He noted children who grow up in a society that grants marriage rights to those regardless of sexual orientation will be better off.

“The family is changing,” McFadden said while discussing the ruling’s societal consequences.

Others interviewed this month said they were opposed to the ruling because the federal government had no business interfering in state and local self-rule.

That argument, however, didn’t sit well with American student Kara Suvada.

“Human rights take precedent over states’ rights,” Suvada.

 

Women making strides in life but not media representations

Washington D.C. residents and visitors agree that women are portrayed poorly in the media today with attention directed to female bodies and emotions rather than their accomplishments.

Taylor Blowers, 16 and Bina Lee, 16 smile for women's rights in Starbucks. Photo courtesy of Naima Fonrose
Taylor Blowers, 16 and Bina Lee, 16 smile for women’s rights in Starbucks. Photo courtesy of Naima Fonrose

Women are objectified in the media constantly due to stereotypes and unrealistic standards, an issue that has lingered for decades. They are underrepresented and treated differently than men.

“For the most part, women are portrayed very poorly in mainstream media,” said Camilla Duke, 17, from Bethesda. “They’re objectified, they’re put into stereotypical boxes, and their voices are stifled by the male-dominated industry.”

The media’s coverage of women is focused on their appearance. Women’s bodies and appearance are central to their coverage in the public eye.

“There are two main types of women shown in mainstream media: the thin girl, and the fat girl, whose weight is a central part of her character and existence,” Duke said. “It’s uncommon to see anything in between.”

Either way women are looking to the media to see the body standard that society says they should strive for. The media portrays that their personal value is determined by how they look. Women’s bodies are everywhere and are used for marketing and advertising from potato chips to cars to cologne.

According to the National Association of Anorexia Nervosa and Associated Disorders, the body type portrayed in advertising as the ideal is possessed naturally by only 5 percent of American females and 69 percent of girls in the 5th to 12th grade reported that magazine pictures influenced their idea of the perfect body shape.

“Diversifying the pool of women that appears in mainstream media will have a greater impact than many may think,” Duke said. “It’s so much easier to have healthy, positive self image when you can see someone who looks like you in a position where she’s considered beautiful.”

In media women are underrepresented, this can be proven by a test done that rates female representation in movies.

The Bechdel Test has criteria for women in movies. The movie has to have at least two named women in it who talk to each other about something besides a man to pass. The test seems simple but major motion pictures such as the Lord of the Rings trilogy and Godzilla do not pass the test, Alex Hudome, 17 said.

Some teenagers hope the tide is turning.

Taylor Blowers,16 said, “Women in general are getting a bigger role.”

Many female celebrities are criticized for doing the same thing men do such as singing songs about their romantic experiences. One prominent example is Taylor Swift.

“No one makes fun of Bruno Mars for writing love songs or tells Ed Sheeran’s girlfriends to “watch out, he’ll write a song about you,” Hudome said. “Taylor Swift’s dating life is a more heavily discussed topic than her successes and achievements, and there’s something very wrong with that.

The media’s representation of women is poor and unbalanced.

“It’s always about what women are wearing, how young or old they look, who they’ve slept with, and what they look like, rather than their talent, awards, achievements, and their creative and/or professional work,” Hudome said.