Residents say terrorism here to stay; vow to live life

Michael Barr believes terrorism in the United States and abroad is here to stay.

Attempts to stop militants or radicals from disrupting everyday life only will make terrorists more vigilant. He cites a fracture between two cultures that he feels will be “long and demanding.”

Barr, an aviation and aircraft safety expert in California, is among a dozen people interviewed this week after a high-profile terrorist attack in Nice, France who said terrorism here and abroad is a part of everyday life now. Others responded to attacks of the last year including those domestic incidents in Orlando and San Bernardino, plus foreign attacks in Paris and Brussels, and said they see no end in sight.

“Religious and political leaders will need to take a more active participation in a solution or the fight will go on for a very long time,” Barr, a senior instructor at the University of Southern California, said by email.

“To stop living a normal life in constant fear is a waste of precious life,” Barr continued.

In the past 12 months, more than 500 Europeans have been killed by acts of terrorism in Nice, Paris, Brussels and Turkey, according to a Teen Observer analysis. That’s on the minds of American University students and graduates getting ready to travel abroad this summer and fall.

Alex Mazzarisi, 22, an American University graduate, is headed in August to Copenhagen, Denmark. Mazzarisi was at the World Trade Center in New York City two days before the 9/11 attacks. She said people should not let fear dictate their lives.

“There is, unfortunately, no way to prevent being in the wrong place at the wrong time,” Mazzarisi said.

John Horgan, a professor of Global Studies and Psychology at Georgia State University, said terrorism will continue because it’s an effective short-term strategy.  He said further policymakers here and abroad may never be able to eliminate terrorism.

“We need to get better at devising smarter strategies to combat terrorism,” Horgan said in an email.

“If our response is based on fear, or is devised in the immediate aftermath of tragedy like we saw in Nice, then we will lose,” Horgan continued.

Mary Rutenbeck, 20, a Wake Forest University student working in Washington, D.C. this summer, will spend Fall studying abroad in Copenhagen, Denmark. She believes Americans aren’t worse off than 20 years ago, but said that “the media makes people more aware” of incidents abroad. She hopes 20 years from now, society will be better off.

Mary Rutenbeck (right), 20, a Wake Forest University student working at American University this summer will study abroad this fall. Photo credit Alex Mazzarisi.
Mary Rutenbeck, 20, a Wake Forest University student working at American University this summer, will study abroad this fall. Photo credit Alex Mazzarisi.

Kenneth Cardwell, who works at a Tenleytown hardware store, believes politicians aren’t doing enough to stop terrorism. He says leaders are “telling people what they want to hear.”

Eric Duvall believes terrorism and political responses to it don’t matter. Instead, he said it’s beyond human control. He doesn’t see an end to the attacks around the globe because “there is nothing man can do to correct the problems down here.”

Kristen Luft, 19, a summer teaching assistant at American University, plans to study abroad in Paris next year and admits there is a higher risk of terrorism there. But, it’s not stopping her.

“It is built on ideas,” Luft said of terrorism. “It’s harder to kill off ideas.”

 

 

 

 

 

Third party candidates polling highest since 1996

Screen Shot 2016-07-14 at 11.30.10 AMThird party candidates run for the presidency of the United States every four years.

They never win, and likely won’t this year, but a leading polling group on politics found this election cycle has allowed a small breakthrough for third party candidates–they’re polling higher than they have in 20 years–with many American voters unsatisfied with the two major parties.

Screen Shot 2016-07-14 at 11.30.54 AM
Polling data courtesy Quinnipiac University.

A June 29 Quinnipiac University poll, found when likely voters were asked about the possibility of third party leaders, the popularity of the two major party candidates dropped.

“Usually a potential benefit of third party candidates, even if they don’t win, is that they raise issues that are important to some voters, issues that the main parties are not addressing,” said Jan Leighley, a professor of Political Science at American University. “If the third party candidates can get the major parties/candidates to address these issues, that is an important accomplishment, even when they lose.”

Many people would like to see third parties better represented but don’t think they have a chance of getting a sufficient amount of votes.

Philip Herrera, 24, said his positions are closer to those of Green Party candidate Jill Stein, but he will vote for presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in order to prevent a Donald Trump presidency, thinking Stein can’t win and believing there’s no chance for third party candidates in the current political system.

“We would need to rewrite the Constitution,” Herrera said if Americans wanted to get away from a two-party system.

Some Bernie Sanders supporters will cast their votes for Stein over Clinton, according to the Green Party’s website.

Republicans disappointed with Trump are turning to Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson. Johnson’s slogan on his website reads, “Make American Sane Again,” a likely knock on Trump’s platform to “Make America Great Again.”

But despite the messaging of third party candidates, polls show their chances are small.The Quinnipiac poll showed Johnson getting 8 percent of likely voters’ ballots. Although Stein is absent from the ballot in 28 states, the poll showed she would receive 4 percent.

Ross Perot, who was not affiliated with a major party, captured 18.91 percent of the vote in 1992 and 8.4 percent in 1996. Since then, a third party candidate hasn’t garnered the same amount of attention.

In 2012, 1.69 percent of voters opted for third party candidates compared to 1.4 percent in 2008.

This year, third party candidates’ numbers are better but not enough to get people to think they have a shot at the White House.

“Third-party candidates can’t win this election,” said Chris Hartnett, a registered Independent voter who is still undecided about his November choice. “They don’t have name exposure.”

Esmat Hanano, 22, is unsatisfied with this year’s election and said none of the major candidates deserve his support. He has not, however, looked into possible third-party candidates and doesn’t know those candidates by name.

Garrett Schlichte, 21, believed third party candidates should get more attention, but won’t be getting it anytime soon. He said more parties and candidates would provide Americans with “a greater diversity of thought.”

Meg Bentley, 42, the director of biology teaching labs at American University, said the two-party system “just isn’t working.”

Although many students, faculty and staff at the Northwest Washington, D.C. campus, agree that the system could be improved with more visible third-party candidates, some say they’re a long way from taking hold of high office.

“Not anytime soon,” said Anila D’Mello, 26, of their chances.

 

Third party candidates

IMG_0853

Elias MILLER

Antonio NAVATTA

WASHINGTON D.C. – Every four years, several third-party candidates run for the presidency of the United States but never win.However, this election cycle has allowed a breakthrough for third-party candidates, with many voters unsatisfied with the two major candidates chosen to represent them.

Indeed, many former Bernie Sanders supporters are announcing their vote for the Green Party’s Jill Stein over Hillary Clinton and many angry Republicans are turning Libertarian for Gary Johnson over Donald Trump.

Nonetheless, this momentum may not suffice. Presently, Gary Johnson isn’t polling over 8 points and Jill Stein is absent from the ballot in 28 states.

Philip Herrera’s (24) said his positions are closer to those of Stein but will vote for Hillary Clinton in order to prevent a Trump presidency, knowing full-well that his preferred Green Party candidate does not have a chance to win.

Many people would like to see third-parties better represented but don’t think that they have a chance of getting a sufficient amount of votes.

Said Anila D’mello, 26, they will “not [get a] vote. Not anytime soon”

Moreover, Garrett Schlichte, 21, believed third party candidates should get more attention, but won’t be getting it anytime soon.

“Third-party candidates can’t win this election,” said Chris Hartnett, “they don’t have name exposure.”

When asked to pinpoint a time at which these candidates would get greater support, Mariafernanda Zacarias as well as Chris and Mary Hartnett estimated third-party candidates will have better recognition in two election cycles.

“If not now, never.”

Meg Bentley, 42, expressed her dismay that, despite this year’s particular climate, only two parties truly have a chance, and believes that the system will not change any time soon.

According to Schlichte, “a greater diversity of thought” would be available to the voters if we exited this two party system which “just isn’t working”, said Bentley.

“We would need to rewrite the Constitution,” said Herrera.

Esmat Hanano, 22, is unsatisfied with this year’s election, but does not plan on voting, “in part because [he’s] lazy” but also due to the fact none of the major candidates deserve his support. He has not, however, looked into possible third-party candidates: like many, he does not know the lesser-known candidates by name.

He and his wife Mary both said that “voting is a privilege, […] a peaceful transition of power” but both are registered independent and don’t still know who they are voting for, only a few months away from the election.

All this goes to show that Robert Byrne was correct when saying “democracy is being allowed to vote for the candidate you dislike least.”